Other Statutes Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Ford Motor Company v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Mutual Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv11286
Plaintiff: Ford Motor Company
Defendant: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Mutual Insurance Company and The Blue Cross Blue Shield Association
Petitioner: Felix Brizuela
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Beck v. Ford Motor Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv12079
Plaintiff: Steven Beck, David Braden, Mark Willard and others
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Marshall Lloyd, et al v. Ford Motor Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1245
Not Classified By Court: In re: FORD MOTOR COMPANY F-150 AND RANGER TRUCK FUEL ECONOMY MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARSHALL B. LLOYD, DUSTIN DAWSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RICK SHAWLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2012md02311
Plaintiff: A1A Airport & Limousine Service, Inc., AGA Realty LLC, Ifeoma Adams and others
Defendant: AB SKF, ALPS Electric (North America), Inc., Alps Automotive, Inc. and others
Interested Party: American Honda Motor Company, Inc., Timmy A. Curtis, Sherman Bearings, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America, Inc., Thomas Saris, Jim Sciaroni and others
Petitioner: Sandra Singer and David Dishman
Respondent: Hino Motors Manufacturing U.S.A. Inc.
In Re: Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
Special Master: Gene J. Esshaki
Intervenor: Financial Recovery Services, LLC and United States of America
Claimant: Certain End-Payor Settlement Class Members and Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc.
CARRUM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2021mc51425
Plaintiff: CARRUM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
3Rd Party Defendant: APTIV SERVICES US, LLC
In re: Ford Motor Company
as 22-0109
Petitioner: In re: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Respondent: PAUL WEIDMAN, TERESA PERRY, ROY NAASZ and others
Coates v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2022mc51349
Plaintiff: Millentine Coates
Defendant: Ford Motor Company and XYZ Corporation
Interested Party: Veoneer US, Inc.
Wire Harness - Direct Purchaser Actions
as 2:2012cv00101
Defendant: FURUKAWA WIRING SYSTEMS AMERICA, INC., Furukawa Electric Company, Limited, American Furukawa, Inc. and others
In Re: Wire Harness - Direct Purchaser Actions
Plaintiff: Martinez Manufacturing, Inc., Mexican Industries In Michigan, Incorporated, T.M. MORRIS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. and others
Petitioner: Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. and Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.
Interested Party: Wire Harness-Dealership Plaintiffs, Mitsuba Corporation, American Mitsuba Corporation and others
Wire Harness - Lead Case
as 2:2012cv00100
Plaintiff: Ifeoma Adams, Jude Anheluk, Archer-Perdue, Inc., d/b/a Archer-Perdue Suzuki and others
Defendant: American Furukawa, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc., Autoliv B.V. & Co. KG and others
In Re: Wire Harness - Lead Case
Interested Party: Mitsuba Corporation and American Mitsuba Corporation
Not Classified By Court: Grupo Antolin North America, Incorporated
Gamboa et al v. Ford Motor Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv10106
Defendant: Ford Motor Company, Robert Bosch LLC and Robert Bosch GmbH
Plaintiff: Pete Petersen, William Sparks, Len Gamboa and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: James Ruston, Vic Sparano, Andreas Alsdorf and others
Consolidated Defendant: James Hackett, Mark Fields and Volkmar Denner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?