Cases 1 - 10 of 544
Dorfman et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2024cv10942
Plaintiff:
Neil Dorfman, Travis Corby, Chad Hobson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Johnson v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2024cv10941
Plaintiff:
Brent Johnson
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Hood v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2024cv10910
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hood, Jr.
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Babcock-Wojahn v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2024cv10335
Plaintiff:
Chelsey Lynn Babcock-Wojahn
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jones v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2024cv10721
Plaintiff:
Gerkarrah Jones
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv10513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kageta Tech LLC v. Ford Motor Co.
as 2:2024cv10599
Plaintiff:
Kageta Tech, LLC
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Miller v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2023cv13294
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Vickie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
NEO Wireless, LLC Patent Litigation
as 2:2022md03034
In Re:
NEO Wireless, LLC Patent Litigation
Defendant:
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, American Honda Motor Co Inc, Honda Development & Manufacturing of America, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Neo Wireless, LLC
Special Master:
Scott Woloson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
