Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Terry Wagner v. Forrest Ashby, et al
as 19-1647
Defendant / Appellee:
FORREST ASHBY, BYRON LAW, PETER LEONETTI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRY WAGNER
Jermaine Carpenter v. James Clayton, et al
as 16-2168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERMAINE D. CARPENTER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES C. CLAYTON, CURTIS PARSONS, FORREST ASHBY and others
Walker v. Williams et al
as 3:2013cv03358
Plaintiff:
Frankie N Walker, Sr
Defendant:
Tarry Williams, James Clayton, Forrest Ashby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greenfield et al v. Clayton et al
as 3:2013cv03359
Plaintiff:
Tommy Greenfield and Steven Steward
Defendant:
James C Clayton, Tarry Williams, Forrest Ashby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beasley et al v. Schuyler County et al
as 3:2013cv03234
Plaintiff:
Otis Beasley, Jermaine Carpenter, Terry C Johnson and others
Defendant:
Schuyler County, Michelle Saddler, Larry Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smego v. Hankins et al
as 3:2013cv03154
Plaintiff:
Richard M Smego
Defendant:
Joseph Hankins, Sandra Simpson, Forrest Ashby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schwab v. Scott et al
as 3:2013cv03145
Plaintiff:
Danny Raymond Schwab
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Forrest Ashby, Reggy Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Liberty Healthcare et al
as 3:2013cv03085
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wright
Defendant:
Liberty Healthcare, Forrest Ashby, Gregory Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Ashby et al
as 1:2013cv02081
Petitioner:
Jackie E. Hughes
Respondent:
Forrest Ashby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carpenter v. Clayton et al
as 3:2013cv03073
Plaintiff:
Jermaine D Carpenter
Defendant:
James C Clayton, Curtis Parsons, Forrest Ashby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
