Cases 1 - 10 of 73
GARSON et al v. CALDWELL MARINE INTERNATIONAL, LLC et al
as 2:2024mc00012
Plaintiff:
SCOTT GARSON, KAREN GARSON and WIFE KAREN GARSON
Defendant:
CALDWELL MARINE INTERNATIONAL, LLC, ATLANTIC COAST TUG AND MARINE, LLC, CABLE BARGE and others
SOKOLICH et al v. US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 2:2023cv21728
Plaintiff:
As Mayor of Fort Lee MARK SOKOLICH, RICHARD GALLER and MARK SOKOLICH
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, in official capacity SHAILEN BHATT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jonathan DaveyIn re: Jonathan Davey
as 23-1335
Petitioner:
In re: JONATHAN DAVEY
Respondent:
WARDEN LAMINE N'DIAYE, Fort Dix FCI and RENEE M. BUMB
City of Nanticoke, Pennsylvania et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2021cv01958
Plaintiff:
City of Nanticoke, Pennsylvania, City of Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, Columbia County, Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Vincent Pisciotta v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 21-3114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCENT PISCIOTTA
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
Akeem Gumbs v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 21-2239
Petitioner:
AKEEM R. GUMBS
Respondent:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
Akeem Gumbs v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 21-1565
Respondent:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
Petitioner:
AKEEM R. GUMBS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FORTES v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00577
Defendant:
CREDIT ONE FINANCIAL, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., TRANS UNION, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ELIZABETH FORTES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
