Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Spatig v. Grondolsky et al
as 1:2017cv11023
Plaintiff: Max Spatig
Defendant: Jeffrey Grondolsky, Fort Devens Federal Medical Center, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levesque v. Fort Devens Federal Medical Center
as 1:2017cv10103
Plaintiff: Andre Levesque
Defendant: Fort Devens Federal Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pavao v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv11114
Plaintiff: Luis Pavao
Defendant: United States of America, Federal Medical Center Fort Devens, Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forte v. Commissioner of Corrections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv40173
Petitioner: Michael Forte
Respondent: Commissioner of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fortes v. USA
as 1:2013cv12082
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: John Fortes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Malouf v. Devens F.M.C et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv10036
Plaintiff: Michael J. Malouf
Defendant: Devens F.M.C, Turner, Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forte v. Dickhaut
as 1:2011cv10862
Petitioner: Michael B. Forte
Respondent: Thomas Dickhaut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wattleton v. Kelly et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv40199
Plaintiff: David Earl Wattleton
Defendant: Kelly and Fort Devens Federal Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fort v. Grant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv11804
Petitioner: Lee E. Fort
Respondent: Michael G. Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Forte v. Hampden County et al
as 3:2008cv30230
Plaintiff: Michael B. Forte
Defendant: Hampden County, Mary Lou Rup, Eldon Wallen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?