Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Kisliuk v. City of Fort Bragg et al
as 1:2023cv06358
Plaintiff: Daniel Kisliuk
Defendant: City of Fort Bragg, Thomas O'Neal, Jarod Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fort Thomas Independent School District, By and Through the Board of Education of Fort Thomas, Kentucky v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv03231
Plaintiff: Fort Thomas Independent School District, By and Through the Board of Education of Fort Thomas, Kentucky
Defendant: Meta Platforms, Inc., Facebook Holdings, LLC, Facebook Operations, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fort Wayne Community Schools v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv02308
Plaintiff: Fort Wayne Community Schools
Defendant: Meta Platforms Inc., Facebook Holdings, LLC, Facebook Operations LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Fort Towson School District v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01776
Plaintiff: Fort Towson School District
Defendant: Meta Platforms, Inc., Facebook Holdings, LLC, Facebook Operations, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bibb County, Alabama et al v. McKinsey and Company Inc
as 3:2023cv00226
Plaintiff: Bibb County, Alabama, Cherokee County, Alabama, City of Cullman, Alabama and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jefferson County, AL et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv06561
Plaintiff: Jefferson County, AL, CITY OF MOUNTAIN BROOK, AL, CITY OF PLEASANT GROVE, AL and others
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, Inc., McKinsey Holdings, Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Fort Bragg et al v. Mendocino Railway
as 4:2022cv06317
Plaintiff: City of Fort Bragg and California Coastal Commission
Defendant: Mendocino Railway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Freeman v. Burbank et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv05022
Plaintiff: Scott Freedman and Scott Freeman
Defendant: Russell Burbank, Stephen Hurst, Sunray Asset Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Forte Labs, Inc. v. Pocketful of Quarters, Inc.
as 4:2022cv04982
Plaintiff: Forte Labs, Inc.
Defendant: Pocketful of Quarters, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Mendocino Railway v. Ainsworth et al
as 4:2022cv04597
Plaintiff: Mendocino Railway
Defendant: Defendant Jack Ainsworth, City of Fort Bragg and Jack Ainsworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?