Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Forte v. State of Georgia
as 1:2023cv04378
Petitioner:
Calvin Deondre Forte
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tucker v. DuttLinger et al
as 1:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Marvin Bernard Tucker and Tuck
Defendant:
Ronald DuttLinger, Donna Young, Deputy Warden Karl Fort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamonte v. Young et al
as 1:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
McKinney Charlie Lamonte, Jr. and Charlie Lamonte McKinney, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. Young, Warden Mr. Fort and Well Path
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. FORT
as 1:2023cv00095
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
KARL FORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webber v. Fort et al
as 1:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert Webber
Defendant:
Karl Fort, Georgia Department of Corrections, Georgia Board of Regents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pipore v. Oliver et al
as 1:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Mwamaratunga Pipore
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Warden Reynolds Fort, Keith Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Geddie et al
as 1:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
John Christopher Hughes
Defendant:
Lewis Geddie and Warden Karl Fort
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanksley v. Fort
as 1:2023cv00029
Petitioner:
Jordash Tanksley
Respondent:
Fort
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. FORT
as 1:2023cv00021
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN KARL FORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOOD v. FORT et al
as 5:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
BRANDON CRAIG WOOD
Defendant:
KARL FORT, JAMES TAYLOR and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
