Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Chanda Smith v. LAUSD, et al
as 17-55881
Plaintiff:
CHANDA SMITH, through her guardian ad litem Eliza Thompson, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated
Intervenor - Appellant:
MINA LEE and FRANCES MORENO
Defendant - Appellee:
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a California public entity and ROY ROMER, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the LA Unified School District
Mina Lee, et al v. LAUSD, et al
as 17-80115
Defendant - Respondent:
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and ROY ROMER, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the LA Unified School District
Movant - Petitioner:
MINA LEE and FRANCES MORENO
Mina Lee, et al v. USDC-CALA
as 16-72912
:
In re: MINA LEE, FRANCES MORENO, A. F. and others
Petitioner:
MINA LEE, FRANCES MORENO, A. F., Guardian Ad Litem Julia Flores and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a California public entity, ROY ROMER, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the LA Unified School District, CHANDA SMITH and others
Chanda Smith, et al v. LAUSD
as 14-55256
Plaintiff:
CHANDA SMITH, JAVIER MEJIA, ELIZA THOMPSON, Guardina ad Litem for Chanda Smith, individually & on behalf of all other persons similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a California public entity
Movant:
APRIL MUNOZ, JULIA FLORES, CHERYL AYAPANA and others
Movant - Appellant:
MINA LEE and FRANCES MORENO
Thompson, et al v. LAUSD, et al
as 2:1993cv07044
Movant:
A.F., Cheryl Ayapana, California Department of Education and others
Interested Party:
Juana Hernandez and Victor Pineda
Defendant:
Los Angeles United School District and Roy Romer
Plaintiff:
Gloria Mejia, Javier Mejia, Mado Most and others
Unknown:
Katharine Krause, Katharine Krause, Katharine Krause and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
