Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03045
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Leyva-Villapudua v. USA
as 8:2019cv00361
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Francisco Leyva-Villapudua
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Diaz v. Kelm et al
as 4:2018cv03042
Plaintiff:
Francisco Diaz
Defendant:
Jared M. Kelm and Union Tank Car Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Martinez v. Hansen et al
as 8:2017cv00406
Respondent:
Scott Frakes and Brad Hansen
Petitioner:
Francisco J. Martinez
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. USA
as 4:2016cv03134
Petitioner:
Francisco Samuel Nava Hernandez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Avitia-Marquez v. USA
as 4:2016cv03118
Petitioner:
Francisco Avitia-Marquez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Delrio v. USA
as 8:2016cv00321
Petitioner:
Francisco R. Delrio
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Avitia-Marquez v. USA
as 4:2016cv03104
Petitioner:
Francisco Avitia-Marquez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ornelas v. Houston et al
as 8:2013cv00118
Defendant:
Margaret Antley, Nary Flearl, Frank Hopkins and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Ornelas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
