Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Drummond Company Inc et al v. Collingsworth et al
as 2:2015cv00506
Plaintiff:
Drummond Company Inc and Drummond Ltd
Defendant:
Terrence P Collingsworth, Conrad & Scherer LLP, William R Scherer, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961
Francisco Ramirez-Rosquero v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-60471
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO RAMIREZ-ROSQUERO, also known as Francisco Rosquero Ramirez, also known as Francisco Ramirez Rosquero
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04025
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00807
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Francisco Ramirez-Galindo v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73421
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO RAMIREZ-GALINDO, AKA Francisco Galinda, AKA Plutarco Villa
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Francisco Solano-Ramirez
as 12-12769
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO SOLANO-RAMIREZ, a.k.a. Francisco Ramirez, a.k.a. Francisco Genaro Ramirez-Herrera, a.k.a. Francisco G. Ramirez Herrera
Francisco Ramirez-Cruz v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-71325
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO RAMIREZ-CRUZ, AKA Armando Augustin-Nunez, AKA Francisco Ramirez, AKA Francisco Cruz Ramirez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Efren Pantoja-Carretero
as 12-50055
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EFREN PANTOJA-CARRETERO, also known as Antonio Gonzalez-Ramirez, also known as Efren Pantoja, also known as Francisco Ramirez Vargas
USA v. Francisco Ramirez-Reynosa
as 12-10001
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO RAMIREZ-REYNOSA
Francisco Ramirez-Gomez, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-72308
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO RAMIREZ-GOMEZ and CRISTINA LOPEZ GOMEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
