Civil Rights Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 103
HENRY v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01276
Plaintiff: MICHAEL F. HENRY
Defendant: JOHN ROBERTS, MARY JANE THEIS, DIANE SYKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenneth Walker v. National Property Board, et al
as 24-7061
Plaintiff: Kenneth Walker
Defendant: National Property Board, Andreas Ten Berge, Urlika Frank and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7058
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
WALKER v. NATIONAL PROPERTY BOARD et al
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff: KENNETH WALKER
Defendant: NATIONAL PROPERTY BOARD, ANDREAS TEN BERGE, URLIKA FRANK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
TATUM v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff: THOMAS TATUM
Defendant: JOSEPH BIDEN, METROPOLITAN POLICE, DANIEL THAU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
In re: Navy Chaplaincy
as 23-5283
In Re: In re: Navy Chaplaincy
Plaintiff / Appellant: Thomas Patrick Doney, as representative for Patrick Doney, Richard F. Hamme, Gary Heinke and others
Defendant / Appellee: United States Navy, Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of the U.S. Navy, Rick Cheeseman, Vice Admiral, Chief of Naval Personnel and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03253
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02459
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BERRY v. YELLIN et al
as 1:2023cv02519
Plaintiff: JEFFREY R. BERRY
Defendant: ROBERT RUBIN, CITIBANK, ALAN GREENSPAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?