Cases 1 - 10 of 159
Coverson v. Shankle et al
as 1:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
Frank L. Coverson
Defendant:
Aariel Shankle, Citiside Properties, Bonita Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Douglas et al v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2024cv01009
Plaintiff:
Erika Danielle Douglas and Keiana Danae Douglas
Defendant:
Sheriff Frank Reynolds and Deputy Amanda Gergans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Caudle v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv05242
Plaintiff:
Allen Okechukwu Caudle
Defendant:
United States of America, Vice Admiral Frank Whitworth and Dept State Secretary Antony Blinken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Kellogg Company et al
as 1:2023cv00147
Defendant:
Kellogg Company, Keebler, Gallagher Bassett Insurance and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Emmanuel Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
