Cases 1 - 10 of 3,505
United States of America v. April et al
as 3:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kathleen April, Arthur E. Bailey, James M. Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Smith v. Angel et al
as 3:2024cv02723
Plaintiff:
Jude David Smith
Defendant:
Bobbie Angel, Frank Angel, Marilyn Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tuerpe v. Slootman et al
as 5:2024cv02502
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tuerpe
Defendant:
Frank Slootman, Michael Scarpelli, Benoit Dageville and others
(PS) Dayton v. City of Fairfield et al
as 2:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Edward R. Dayton
Defendant:
City of Fairfield, Nathan Strickland, Frank Piro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Agatha Marie Frank v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Agatha Marie Frank
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Frank Swensen v. Lowe's Home Centers LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03053
Plaintiff:
Frank Swensen
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers LLC, Manhattan Hardwood Floors LLC and DOES 1 to 50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Genene Frank v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00742
Plaintiff:
Genene Frank
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Paul Frank Limited v. China Brands Group
as 2:2024cv02759
Petitioner:
Paul Frank Limited
Respondent:
China Brands Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Liao v. Fisher Asset Management, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02036
Plaintiff:
Frank Liao
Defendant:
FISHER ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC DBA FISHER INVESTMENTS and THE FISHER INVESTMENTS 401(k) PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
