Cases 1 - 10 of 16
George Tustin, Jr. v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 16-41724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE EDWARD TUSTIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, BRYAN COLLIER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, FRANKIE REESCANO and others
Jackson v. Reescano, Sr. Warden et al
as 3:2016cv00299
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jackson
Defendant:
Frankie Reescano, Sr. Warden and Kenneth Jolley, Asst. Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Days v. Reescano et al
as 3:2016cv00194
Plaintiff:
Frank Joseph Days
Defendant:
Frankie Reescano, Unknown Jolly, Kendric M Demyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamez v. Perry et al
as 3:2015cv00319
Plaintiff:
Lupe Florencio Gamez
Defendant:
Rick Perry, Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Reescano et al
as 3:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
Josue V Perez
Defendant:
Frankie Reescano, Kenneth Jolly, Lettie Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farmer v. Stephens et al
as 3:2015cv00108
Plaintiff:
Calip J Farmer
Defendant:
William Stephens, Frankie Reescano, Kendric M Demyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Reescano et al
as 3:2013cv00264
Plaintiff:
Terry Junior Peterson
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth B. Jolley, Lieutenant Rachel M. Baysinger, Lieutenant Joseph A. Balzen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuels v. Reescano et al
as 4:2012cv02543
Plaintiff:
Will Adrian Samuels
Defendant:
Frankie Reescano and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuels v. Reescano et al
as 4:2012cv02251
Plaintiff:
Will Adrian Samuels
Defendant:
Frankie Reescano, Anita and Balsten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuels v. Reescano
as 4:2012cv01753
Plaintiff:
Will Adrian Samuels
Defendant:
Frankie Reescano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
