Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Franklin v. Agnor et al
as 7:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Saunders Franklin
Defendant:
C/O Agnor and Lt. Brogdom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Franklin v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00771
Petitioner:
Jonathan R. Franklin
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval and D.O.J. (FBOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ofori v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. White et al
as 7:2023cv00679
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Lockriagh et al
as 7:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
Saunders Miles Franklin
Defendant:
Superintendant Lockriagh, C/O Allen, Dottie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Angna et al
as 7:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
Saunders Franklin
Defendant:
C/O Angna, Sgt. Barksdale, Lt. Day and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Allen et al
as 7:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Saunders Franklin
Defendant:
C/O Allen, Lt. Bay, Lt. Brogran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Jones et al
as 7:2023cv00481
Plaintiff:
Saunders Franklin
Defendant:
Nurse Jones, Dottie, Nurse Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johns v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Lameek Shalam Johns
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold Clarke, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
