Cases 51 - 60 of 3,601
Claude Sanders v. CIR
as 24-1053
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLAUDE FRANKLIN SANDERS
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
USA v. Terrell Franklin
as 24-1042
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRELL XAVIER FRANKLIN
Leon FranklinIn re: Leon Franklin
as 24-10197
Petitioner:
In re: LEON JR. FRANKLIN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
IRWS, LLC v. Elmore County, et al.
as 24-345
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRWS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
ELMORE COUNTY, ELMORE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, ELMORE COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Leaming v. Sampson, et al.
as 24-207
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH WAYNE LEAMING
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW SAMPSON, Fiduciary, et ux., V.A. Chief of Police, MICHAEL J. FRANKLIN, Director, Fiduciary, et ux., V.A. Police Service, JOHN DOE and others
Franklin v. Audiocity Wheels, Inc
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Franklin
Defendant:
Audiocity Wheels, Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Leaming v. Smith, et al.
as 24-92
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH WAYNE LEAMING
Defendant / Appellee:
DONNY SMITH, V.A. Puget Sound Chief of Police doing business as Lt. J. Doe, et ux., VA Police, MICHAEL J. FRANKLIN, Director, Fiduciary, et ux., V.A. Police Service, THOMAS BUNDT, (Successor) Fiduciary, et ux. doing business as VA Puget Sound VA Executive Director and others
BERDAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BERDAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
BERDAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BERDAN, SUSAN K. WILSON, JESSICA BRUCKNER and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
