Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Ellison v. USA
as 6:2015cv01839
Petitioner:
Charles Franklin Ellison
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Webster et al v. Taylor
as 3:2015cv00706
Defendant:
James M. Taylor
Plaintiff:
Marjorie M. Webster and Franklin W. Webster, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Barker, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, et al.
as 3:2014cv00928
Plaintiff:
Charles Barker, III and Andrew Neilson
Defendant:
Chicago Title Company, Franklin American Mortgage Company, Lane Powell PC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
State of Oregon v. Oregon Coast Scenic Railroad et al
as 3:2014cv00530
Defendant:
Oregon Coast Scenic Railroad and Rick Franklin Corporation
Plaintiff:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 10101 Interstate Commerce Act
Glasscock v. Taylor
as 2:2014cv00016
Petitioner:
Charles Franklin Glasscock
503) 326-5524 (fax:
Steven T. Wax
Respondent:
Jeri Taylor
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01689
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Clark v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 6:2013cv01546
Counter Claimant:
Amanda Bollinger, Kim Ebert, Elizabeth Falcone and others
Defendant:
Amanda Bollinger, Denis R. Brown, Franklin Codel and others
Counter Defendant:
Andrew G. Clark
Plaintiff:
Andrew G. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lefever v. Angelozzi
as 3:2013cv00918
Respondent:
Mr. Rick Angelozzi
Petitioner:
Franklin Carl Lefever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
