Cases 1 - 10 of 350
Calhoun v. USA
as 4:2024cv00403
Petitioner:
Fred Calhoun
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Wernecke, Jr v. Andrews
as 1:2023cv01216
Petitioner:
Fred Walter Wernecke, Jr
Respondent:
Matt Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morris v. Parole Board
as 3:2023cv02199
Plaintiff:
Fred Morris
Defendant:
Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wernecke, Jr v. Andrews DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERED OUT.
as 7:2023cv00337
Petitioner:
Fred Walter Wernecke, Jr
Respondent:
Matt Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Green v. Judge Fred Biery, et al..
as 5:2023cv01112
Plaintiff:
Lowell Green
Defendant:
Judge Fred Biery, et al..
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Judge Fred Biery, et al.
as 5:2023cv01064
Plaintiff:
Lowell Green
Defendant:
Judge Fred Biery, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Judge Fred Biery, et al..
as 5:2023cv01067
Plaintiff:
Lowell DeQuincy Green
Defendant:
Judge Fred Biery, et al..
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Coleman et al
as 6:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Fred A. Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
Jill P Coleman, Katie Hamilton, Sarah Pierson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Skyview Law Library Correspondent
as 6:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Fred A. Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
Skyview Law Library Correspondent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thacker v. Garcia et al
as 5:2023cv00906
Petitioner:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia, U.S. District Judge Fred Biery, U.S. District Judge Jason K. Pulliam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
