Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Sarah Vitort v. Kroger Company
as 22-35185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SARAH VITORT, a consumer residing in Oregon, individually and on behalf of all others situated
Defendant / Appellee:
KROGER COMPANY, FRED MEYER STORES, INC., an Ohio corporation and DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive
Vitort v. The Kroger Company et al
as 3:2020cv01317
Defendant:
The Kroger Company, Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., Does 1 through 100 and others
Plaintiff:
Sarah Vitort
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 cl Class Action Fairness Action - 2005
Consumer Research and Protection, Inc. v. Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Consumer Research and Protection, Inc.
Defendant:
Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
NLRB v. Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.
as 15-1167
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.
Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. v. NLRB
as 15-1135
Petitioner:
Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. v. NLRB
as 12-1486
Petitioner:
Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Law Project for Psychiatric Ri, et al v. Osamu Matsutani, et al
as 10-35887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAW PROJECT FOR PSYCHIATRIC RIGHTS, ex rel. United States of America and DANIEL I. GRIFFIN, ex rel. United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
OSAMU H. MATSUTANI, MD, WILLIAM HOGAN, individually and as Commissioner of the Department of Health and Social Services, TAMMY SANDOVAL, individually and as Director of the Alaska Office of Children's Services and others
NLRB v. Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.
as 10-72652
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
FRED MEYER STORES, INC.
NLRB v. Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.
as 10-72651
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
FRED MEYER STORES, INC.
NLRB v. Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.
as 10-1102
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
