Cases 1 - 10 of 36
BANKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv04188
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN DAVID ORTIZ, WARDEN R. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BANKS v. DIRECTOR et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BANKS v. KODGER
as 1:2022cv04369
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
WARDEN KODGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04131
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02155
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BANKS v. CAPACCIO et al
as 1:2022cv02154
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
NICK CAPACCIO, JAMES C. DUFF, WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01605
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01604
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01389
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BANKS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2022cv00538
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, BOP NATIONAL LOCKDOWN, MICHAEL CARJAVAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
