Cases 1 - 10 of 40
DAVIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03024
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK DAVIS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MORRAST v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv23138
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK MORRAST
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
FIELDS v. FREDRICK
as 1:2022cv00676
Plaintiff:
HAILE S. FIELDS
Defendant:
OFFICER ROCCO FREDRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv20414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv18488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv13062
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FLY v. ROTH et al
as 1:2021cv09696
Plaintiff:
TONI FLY and WILLIAM ANTHONY FLY
Defendant:
JAY FERGUSON, DANIEL L HOVCAND, M SEGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MACDONALD v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2021cv04518
Defendant:
SGT. RAGIOLA, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MARTIN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HUFF and others
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK M. MACDONALD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON et al v. MORRIS COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE et al
as 2:2020cv20713
Defendant:
NEAL HAMILTON, MAUREEN MILLER, DELORRES MANN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WASHINGTON, DEBORAH JONES-WASHINGTON, MICHAEL WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUEENSBURY v. SHUSTED et al
as 1:2020cv19993
Defendant:
HON. THOMAS J. SHUSTED, JR., ERIC JAMES LISZEWSKI and LEAH TRAUB
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK A. QUEENSBURY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
