Cases 1 - 10 of 291
Ewing v. Freedom Forever, LLC
as 3:2024cv00911
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
Freedom Forever, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hess v. Freedom Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 2:2024at00327
Plaintiff:
Damon Hess
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage, Inc. and DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hess v. Freedom Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Damon Hess
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Stephen Meyers et al v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv01529
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN MEYERS and LAUREN MEYERS
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation and Does 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
In re Naturalization Ceremony 2/27/2024
as 3:2024mc80035
Not Yet Classified:
Naturalization Ceremony, Sofya Abraham, Eric Yan Bao and others
In re Naturalization Ceremony 2/27/2024
as 3:2024mc80044
Not Yet Classified:
Sofya Abraham, Eric Yan Bao, Emma Baran and others
Stephen Meyers et al v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 8:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN MEYERS and LAUREN MEYERS
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
U.S. News & World Report, L.P. v. Chiu
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
U.S. News & World Report, L.P.
Defendant:
David Chiu and Health Care
Amicus Curiae:
Mara W. Elliott, City Attorney of San Diego and Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
The VR School et al v. California Department of Education et al
as 3:2023cv06286
Petitioner:
The VR School and Dr. Freedom Cheteni
Respondent:
California Department of Education, Malia Vella and Carrie Lopes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
