Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Freeman v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Eric Freeman
Defendant:
United States and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Donaldson et al v. Crisp et al
as 1:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Donaldson, Jacqui Phillips, Karen Ellis and others
Defendant:
Diamond Hall, Joshua Crisp, AMZ Hunter LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Freeman et al v. CalCon Mutual Mortgage, LLC d/b/a OneTrust Home Loans
as 4:2018cv01265
Plaintiff:
Chad Freeman , Nick Salem and Jason Meinen
Defendant:
CalCon Mutual Mortgage, LLC d/b/a OneTrust Home Loans
Counter_claimant:
CalCon Mutual Mortgage, LLC d/b/a OneTrust Home Loans
Counter_defendant:
Chad Freeman , Jason Meinen and Nick Salem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goldman Phipps PLLC et al v. Gray, Ritter & Graham, P.C. et al
as 2:2013cv00049
Plaintiff:
Goldman Phipps PLLC , Mikal C. Watts, P.C. and Murray Law Firm
Defendant:
Gray, Ritter & Graham, P.C., Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLC, Seeger Weiss LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Freeman v. HSN Corp., et al.
as 3:2012cv00434
Defendant:
Acer Computer Company, First Convenience Bank, First Data Merchant Card Processor and others
Plaintiff:
Sallijo Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 3:2012cv00031
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America, Josue Noyles, Tom Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Esser v. Fretwell et al
as 4:2011cv00962
Plaintiff:
Fred Esser
Defendant:
William T. Fretwell and Morris L. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. The CIT Group/Consumer Finance, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv02662
Plaintiff:
Thomas Freeman
Defendant:
The CIT Group/Consumer Finance, Inc. and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
