Cases 11 - 20 of 23
WILLIAMS v. FROST
as 1:2014cv01731
Plaintiff:
ANDRE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
KEM THOMPSON FROST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EL HAYNES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL v. FROST
as 1:2014cv01472
Plaintiff:
EL HAYNES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL
Defendant:
CHAUN FROST
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
James Frost v. Catholic Univ. of America, et al
as 13-7139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James A. Frost
Defendant - Appellee:
Catholic University of America, John H. Garvey, Nugent Hall, Catholic University, Veryl V. Miles and others
ARMBRUSTER v. FROST et al
as 1:2012cv01584
Defendant:
ERIC FROST and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
NICOLE ARMBRUSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
FROST v. CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv01460
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. FROST
Defendant:
CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA , JOHN H. GARVEY , VERYL V. MILES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharon Galloway v. Beveridge and Diamond, PC, et al
as 11-7154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sharon V. Galloway
Defendant - Appellee:
Beveridge and Diamond, PC, Laura Mcafee, Esquire, Barnes and Thronburg, LLP and others
GALLOWAY v. MARTIN et al
as 1:2011cv02115
Plaintiff:
SHARON V. GALLOWAY
Defendant:
BEVERIDGE AND DIAMOND P.C., LAURA MCAFEE, BARNES AND THRONBURG LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FROST v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv01661
Plaintiff:
KAREN FROST
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Donald Jones v. United States Supreme Court, et al
as 10-5222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Supreme Court, William K. Suter, US Supreme Court Clerk of Court, Gail Johnson, US Supreme Court and others
JONES v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2010cv00910
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, WILLIAM K. SUTER, GAIL JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
