Cases 1 - 10 of 15
O'Connor v. Backman et al
as 3:2018cv01423
Defendant:
Hon. Paul Backman, Michael J. Satz, S. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Nyka O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grantley v. Danley et al
as 3:2017cv00678
Plaintiff:
Derrick Tyrone Grantley
Defendant:
C. E. Danley, G. A. Espino, D. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prater v. Jones et al
as 3:2015cv00810
Plaintiff:
Randall T. Prater
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, J. Shunbert, Stuart K. Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dausch, Jr. v. Corizon Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00421
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Dausch, Jr.
Defendant:
Corizon Corporation, Warden Palmer, G. A. Espino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Logan v. Brad Whitehead, et al
as 15-11019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ALEXANDER LOGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD WHITEHEAD, Asst. Warden, MILTON D. WILLIAMS, Colonel, DR. HERCULE, Doctor and others
OLIVER v. WHITEHEAD et al
as 3:2014cv01213
Plaintiff:
WARREN OLIVER
Defendant:
Whitehead, OLIVIOUS, MUSCLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER v. WHITEHEAD et al
as 1:2014cv00184
Plaintiff:
WARREN OLIVER
Defendant:
WHITEHEAD, OLIVIOUS, MUSCLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Grimage v. G. Espino, et al
as 14-12999
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EUGENE GRIMAGE
Defendant - Appellee:
G. A. ESPINO, Doctor Chief Health Officer, D. HILLIARD, Correctional Officer, BRAD WHITEHEAD and others
Grimage v. Whitehead et al
as 3:2013cv00935
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Grimage, B. Whitehead, D Hilliard and others
Defendant:
G. A. Espino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIMAGE v. WHITEHEAD et al
as 1:2013cv00147
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EUGENE GRIMAGE
Defendant:
B WHITEHEAD, D HILLIARD, TOLLICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
