Cases 1 - 10 of 11
KM SPIRITUAL COLLECTIVE CONFEDERATION et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv00879
Plaintiff:
MICHIGAN MOTHER MEDICINE CHURCH OF KM, TIMOTHY LOCKARD, AARON GIBBS and others
Defendant:
SEAN REYES, STATE OF OREGON, UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAVERGNE et al v. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES et al
as 1:2017cv00793
Plaintiff:
EUGENE MARTIN LAVERGNE, FREDERICK JOHN LAVERGNE, LEONARD P. MARSHALL and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PAUL RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
BOLIN v. BROWN et al
as 1:2015cv01630
Plaintiff:
PAUL C. BOLIN
Defendant:
EDMUND G. BROWN, A. SCHWARZENEGGER, G. DEUKMEJIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. JP MORGAN CHASE
as 1:2014cv02031
Plaintiff:
RANDY G. BROWN
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HIPES v. BROWN et al
as 1:2011cv01993
Plaintiff:
JACK ALLEN HIPES
Defendant:
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., STATE OF CALIFORNIA and DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. WILHELM et al
as 1:2011cv00277
Plaintiff:
L. G. BROWN
Defendant:
M. WILHELM, LOUIS CANNON and ADRIAN FENTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN et al v. CORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF WASHINGTON
as 1:2010cv01418
Plaintiff:
L. G. BROWN, B. K. BROWN and J. L. BROWN
Defendant:
CORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROWN vs. BENAUGH
as 1:2009cv01176
Plaintiff:
LLOYD G. BROWN
Defendant:
BENAUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
