Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Treandous Cotton v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 12-15829
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TREANDOUS A. COTTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, Warden, G. A. NEOTTI, Deputy Chief and others
Oliver v. Evans et al
as 3:2011cv04052
Plaintiff:
James Lucious Oliver
Defendant:
Evans, G. A. Neotti, E. Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crane v. Hatton et al
as 5:2011cv03900
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Crane
Defendant:
S. Hatton, G. Schopf, J. Magallon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Hicks v. M.S. Evans, et al
as 11-16085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
M.S. EVANS, Warden, Salinas Valley State Prison, G. A. NEOTTI, Chief Deputy Warden, L. TREXLER, Associate Warden and others
Hamilton v. Tyler et al
as 5:2010cv01436
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hamilton
Defendant:
Debra Tyler, Marie Scherer, L. Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hubbard et al
as 3:2010cv00177
Plaintiff:
Timothy Leang Jones
Defendant:
Sue Hubbard, M. S. Evans, G. A. Neotti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fred Price v. G. Neotti, et al
as 09-17628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRED PRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
G. A. NEOTTI, D. MANTEL, Facility Captain and S. HJELDEN, Correctional Counselor
Bonty v. Neotti et al
as 4:2009cv04079
Plaintiff:
Miles O. Bonty
Defendant:
G. A. Neotti, J. Stevenson and N. Grannis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonty v. Neotti et al
as 4:2009cv03838
Plaintiff:
Miles O. Bonty
Defendant:
G. A. Neotti, J. Stevenson and N. Grannis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2009cv03408
Plaintiff:
Terrell D. Curry
Defendant:
California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Salinas Valley State Prison, Matthew Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
