Cases 1 - 10 of 17
(PC) Reid v. Walker et al
as 1:2018cv01635
Defendant:
Amanda M. Wood, Tameka L. Walker, Scott J. Van De Putte and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Unnamed Respondents
as 3:2014cv02837
Petitioner:
Eric G Campbell
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Vista Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2014cv02799
Defendant:
Vista Sheriff Department and Brandon Boisseranc
Plaintiff:
Eric G. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Falkenstein v. Shipco Transport, Inc.
as 2:2013cv08052
Plaintiff:
John Falkenstein
Defendant:
Shipco Transport Inc
Unknown:
Robert Chad Hales, Perry Dee Mocciaro, Robert G Campbell and others
Alan D. Bird v. William W. Smith, Jr., et al
as 8:2011cv01871
Plaintiff:
Alan D Bird
Defendant:
Thomas G Campbell, Robert Elliot, Samuel Gulko and others
Thomas G Campbell v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv09944
Plaintiff:
Thomas G Campbell
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and United States of America
Brian Ford et al v. William W Smith Jr et al
as 8:2011cv01761
Defendant:
Thomas G Campbell, Robert E Elliott, Samuel Gulko and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Ford and Marilyn Ford
James Bogeazis v. William W Smith Jr et al
as 8:2011cv01753
Plaintiff:
James Bogeazis
Defendant:
Thomas G Campbell, Robert E Elliott, Samuel Gulko and others
William A Niese et al v. Chandler Trust No 1 et al
as 2:2011cv07577
Defendant:
Prism Partners I, L.P., Prism Partners III Leveraged, L.P., Philip Chandler and others
Plaintiff:
William A Niese, Judge James R Simpson, W Thomas Johnson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud
In re Smith Micro Software, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation
as 8:2011cv01394
Defendant:
Thomas G Campbell, DOES, Robert Elliott and others
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Estes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
