Cases 1 - 10 of 26
(PC) Trujillo v. CDCR et al
as 2:2023cv01531
Plaintiff:
Larry Trujillo
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, N. Malakka, A. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Garland v. CDCR et al
as 2:2023cv00418
Plaintiff:
Shaun Darnell Garland
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Correctional Health Care Services, Correspondence and Appeals Branch, Policy and Risk Management Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond Bradford v. G. Church, et al
as 23-15293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
G. CHURCH, CARSON, B. BYRANT and others
(PC) Harris v. Nguyen et al
as 2:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
David D. Harris
Defendant:
Eugene Nguyen and G. Church
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Church et al v. C.R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01384
Plaintiff:
Debra Church and Alfred G. Church, Jr.
Defendant:
C.R Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Bradford v. Church et al
as 2:2021cv01412
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Defendant:
G. Church, Carson, B. Byrant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bullinger v. Church
as 8:2020cv00931
Defendant:
Frederick Church, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Peggy E. Nardone and Frederick G. Church
Plaintiff:
Anna Bullinger
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
(PC) Carr v. Balaji et al
as 2:2019cv00688
Defendant:
G. Church, S. Suson, R. Singh and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
(PC) Torres v. Lewis et al
as 2:2018cv03141
Defendant:
G. Church, L. Gideon, J. Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
