Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Maurice G. Davis, Sr. v. J.P. Stadtmueller
as 24-1628
Petitioner:
MAURICE G. DAVIS, SR.
Respondent:
J. P. STADTMUELLER
Davis v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
as 3:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Mr. Charles G Davis and Charles G. Davis
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Marshall v. English, et al
as 21-3101
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE (4), Blind IRS Employee/Undercover Person, in his individual and official capacity, TOMMIE TURNER, Client/Associate/Stakeholder-Wizard Services/Joe Marshall's Companies, in his individual capacity, Estate of Travis Johnson, JOHN CORNELIUS, IRS Special Agent, Criminal Investigation Division, Austin, Texas, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN MARSHALL, SR.
Davion Davis v. Dan Cromwell
as 21-1465
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVION G. DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAN CROMWELL
Donovan Davis, Jr. v. Roy Dotson, Jr., et al
as 20-13123
Defendant / Appellee:
ROY DOTSON, JR., individually, KARA WICK, individually and ANDREW BAZEMORE, individually
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONOVAN G. DAVIS, JR.
Donovan Davis, Jr.
as 20-12986
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
DONOVAN G. DAVIS, JR.
USA v. Donovan Davis, Jr.
as 20-10783
Defendant / Appellant:
DONOVAN G. DAVIS, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Donovan Davis, Jr., et al
as 20-10773
Defendant / Appellant:
DONOVAN G. DAVIS, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Teniya Davis v. Andrew Saul
as 20-15236
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TENIYA G. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01496
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
