Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Armin Azod et al v. James G. Robinson et al
as 2:2022cv05214
Petitioner:
Armin Azod, Dr. Ramez Elgammal, Dr. Shantanu Sharma and others
Respondent:
James G. Robinson, Morgan Creek Productions, Inc., Cecilia, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Elgammal et al v. Morgan Creek Productions, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv05143
Plaintiff:
Dr. Ramez Elgammal, Dr Dong Zhang, Dr. Shantanu Sharma and others
Defendant:
Morgan Creek Productions, Inc., Cecilia, LLC, Good Stuff LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv02018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Cecilia LLC et al v. Armin Azod et al
as 2:2019cv09552
Respondent:
Ramez Elgammal, dong zhang, Armin Azod and others
Petitioner:
Morgan Creek Productions, Inc., James G. Robinson, Cecilia LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Joseph G Karmo v. Morgan Creek Entertainment Group et al
as 2:2018cv09148
Defendant:
Steven G. Bagatourian, Lenton T. Hutton, Eddie Gonzales and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph George Karmo
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Armin Azod et al v. James G. Robinson et al
as 2:2016cv00440
Plaintiff:
Armin Azod, Peter John, Shantanu Sharma and others
Defendant:
Cecilia LLC, Morgan Creek Productions Inc and James G. Robinson
E. et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 3:2013cv03037
Plaintiff:
C. D.J. E. , Kelly C. Eidson , Matthew W. Eidson and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. , Pfizer International LLC , McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Blackman v. Brim et al
as 4:2011cv01290
Plaintiff:
Tony Blackman
Defendant:
J. Brim, G. Robinson, N. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackman v. Brim et al
as 1:2011cv00426
Plaintiff:
Tony Blackman
Defendant:
J. Brim, G. Robinson, N. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
