Cases 1 - 10 of 49
James v. Smith
as 4:2015cv01503
Petitioner:
Kadarko Madveke James
Respondent:
G Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Flores-Alfaro v. Hassell et al
as 4:2015cv00618
Petitioner:
Jorge Flores-Alfaro
Respondent:
Scott Hassell , G Smith , Scott Sutterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv08008
Petitioner:
Dedrick G Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wiggins v. Faires et al
as 1:2010cv02410
Plaintiff:
Chavon Wiggins
Defendant:
D Faires, Becky Clay, I Smittie and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rullan v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv00715
Plaintiff:
Robert Rullan
Defendant:
Constance Reese, B Clay, G Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Linsey v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv00696
Plaintiff:
Terrance H Linsey
Defendant:
Constance Reese, B Clay, G Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv00719
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Taylor
Defendant:
Constance Reese, B Clay, G Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhymer v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv00710
Plaintiff:
Steven Rhymer
Defendant:
Constance Reese, B Clay, G Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv00699
Defendant:
Constance Reese, B Clay, G Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Right v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv00711
Plaintiff:
Art Right
Defendant:
Constance Reese, B Clay, G Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
