Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Miller v. Lamontagne et al
as 3:2010cv00702
Plaintiff:
Justin Thomas Miller
Defendant:
John Lamontagne, Richard O Butcher, Jose E Otero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. California Director of Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 1:2008cv01390
Plaintiff:
Willie D. Randle
Defendant:
California Director of Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Warden of Kern Valley State Prison II and G. Smith
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hamilton v. Robles et al
as 3:2008cv01531
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hamilton
Defendant:
L Robles, M McNair, K Saizer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Oba Lee Frelimo v. J. Garcia, et al
as 1:2008cv01040
Plaintiff:
Oba Lee Frelimo
Defendant:
J. Garcia, A. Trujillo, M. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Sisto et al
as 2:2008cv00104
Petitioner:
Christopher G Smith
Respondent:
D. K. Sisto, Board of Parole Hearings and Attorney General CA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. McGuinness et al
as 1:2007cv01373
Plaintiff:
Darnell Carter
Defendant:
William J. McGuinness, David G Smith and N. Load Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Anti, et al
as 2:2007cv01675
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Smith
Defendant:
- Anti, J. Tilton, Gosek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Tate et al
as 1:2007cv00909
Plaintiff:
Antonio Luis Williams
Defendant:
Harold Tate, W.J. Sullivan and David G Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dancy v. Scribner, et al
as 1:2007cv00716
Plaintiff:
Samuel Dancy, Jr.
Defendant:
A. K. Scribner, - Posner, V. Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manson v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv00437
Plaintiff:
Henry Manson, III
Defendant:
David G Smith, Maria Schwartz, Avindra Brar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
