Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Laurent v. Woods et al
as 1:2016cv00452
Plaintiff:
Eugene A Laurent
Defendant:
Mitch G Woods and Jefferson County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deep Water Slender Wells Ltd., et al. v. Shell Oil Company, et al.
as 4:2012cv01166
Plaintiff:
Deep Water Slender Wells Ltd. and James G. Wood
Defendant:
Shell Oil Company, Shell International Exploration and Production B.V., Shell International Exploration and Production Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Pacifica L 49, LLC v. Oaks of Westchase Associates, LP
as 4:2012cv00166
Plaintiff:
U.S. National Association, as Trustee for the Registered Holders of CD 2007-CD4 Commercial Mortgage Trust, Pass-Through Certificates, Series CD 2007-CD4
Defendant:
Oaks of Westchase Associates, LP
Receiver:
James G Wood
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Wood v. CIBER, INC.
as 4:2011cv00708
Defendant:
CIBER, INC.
Plaintiff:
Samuel G. Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood v. Ciber Inc
as 1:2011cv00568
Plaintiff:
Samuel G Wood
Defendant:
Ciber Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00399
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
512:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Morales v. Fox et al
as 1:2008cv00681
Plaintiff:
Pedro Morales
Defendant:
John B Fox, Jody R Upton, T Hammonds and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Daw v. Woods et al
as 1:2007cv00787
Plaintiff:
Lionel Daw, Sr.
Defendant:
Mitch G Woods and Naphcare, Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holland v. Woods
as 1:2007cv00053
Petitioner:
Edward Charles Holland
Respondent:
Mitch G Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
