Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Salcedo v. USA
as 1:2015cv00402
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gabriel Ruiz Salcedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Martin v. City and County of Honolulu
as 1:2015cv00363
Plaintiff:
Tabatha Martin , Tracy Martin , T. M. and others
Defendant:
City and County of Honolulu and DOE Employees of City and County of Honolulu 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aio et al v. Chee
as 1:2014mc00249
Petitioner:
Gabriel Aio, Montgomery Crouch and Eric Aaron Lighter
Respondent:
William S. Chee
Beavers-Gabriel v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00686
Plaintiff:
Karla Beavers-Gabriel
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bates et al v. Hawaii Health Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00459
Plaintiff:
Joanne Bates , Gayle Egdamin , Gabrielle Nguyen and others
Defendant:
Hawaii Health Systems Corporation and Doe Defendants 1-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Harville v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00425
Plaintiff:
Gabriel L. Harville
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
James Campbell Company LLC vs. Kaaikaula, et al
as 1:2013cv00241
Defendant:
James Campbell Company LLC , Kaaikaula, Heirs or Assigns of, Kii Nohea, Heirs or Assigns of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Title
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Apilando v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2012cv00427
Petitioner:
Gabriel S. Apilando
Respondent:
State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Bauer et al
as 1:2012cv00323
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Sofia L. Bauer , Gabriel L. Barnard , John Does 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
