Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Gaskill et al v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv13295
Plaintiff:
Lois L. Gaskill and William M. Gaskill
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jett v. Keith et al
as 1:2015cv00215
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome Jett
Defendant:
Tim Keith, Corrections Corp of America, Mechelle Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeDee v. Morr et al
as 1:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
Darrel Grant LeDee
Defendant:
David Morr, Patricia Thomas, Timothy Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McHenry v. Pattain et al
as 1:2013cv03241
Plaintiff:
Damytric McHenry
Defendant:
Pattain, Willis, Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Archie v. May et al
as 3:2013cv03185
Plaintiff:
Tony J Archie
Defendant:
Steve May, Chris Fredericks, Tim Diel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alleman et al v. BP Exploration & Production Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02003
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Manieri , Ricardo Martinez , Leon McElveen and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
Magner et al v. Gaskill et al
as 2:2013cv00192
Plaintiff:
Michael W Magner and Elizabeth W Magner
Defendant:
Stephanie Crawford Gaskill , Robert E. Gaskill and Timothy Gaskill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Dobbins v. Keith et al
as 1:2012cv03046
Plaintiff:
Michael Dobbins
Defendant:
Tim Keith, Nicole Walker, James LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. C C A of Tennessee L L C et al
as 1:2012cv03005
Plaintiff:
Frederick King
Defendant:
C C A of Tennessee L L C, Tim Keith, Adam Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Gaskill et al
as 1:2012cv00868
Plaintiff:
Clyde Williams
Defendant:
Gaskill, Tim Keith, Pat Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
