Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jordan v. Hill et al
as 3:2023cv00748
Plaintiff:
James E Jordan
Defendant:
Adam L Hill, Geico Indemnity Company, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Harris et al v. Wilshire Insurance Co et al
as 3:2016cv00774
Plaintiff:
Carylnn Harris , Chantell Harris and Corey Harris
Defendant:
Wilshire Insurance Co , South Pacific Transport Co , David Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maxwell v. Lesnick et al
as 1:2016cv00300
Plaintiff:
Brittany Maxwell
Defendant:
Brent Lesnick , Geico Indemnity Co and A B C Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Muckelroy v. Geico Indemnity Co
as 6:2014cv00447
Defendant:
Geico Indemnity Co
Plaintiff:
Vickie Lee Muckelroy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shedwin v. Geico Indemnity Co et al
as 1:2014cv00540
Plaintiff:
Reginald Shedwin
Defendant:
Bennie Lucas, Geico Indemnity Co and Farmers Insurance Co of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bernard v. Foerster et al
as 6:2013cv02105
Plaintiff:
Christine Bernard
Defendant:
Ryan Foerster, Geico Indemnity Co and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
v. Foerster et al
as 6:2013cv02104
Defendant:
Ryan Foerster and Geico Indemnity Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Prier v. Geico Indemnity Co
as 1:2011cv01565
Plaintiff:
Destiny Prier
Defendant:
Geico Indemnity Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keys et al v. Hunter et al
as 1:2009cv00447
Plaintiff:
Mildred Keys, Kevin Keys, Terrence Holman and others
Defendant:
Cedric Hunter, Geico Indemnity Co, Erika McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Geico Indemnity Co v. U S A
as 1:2008cv01536
Plaintiff:
Geico Indemnity Co
Defendant:
U S A and Russell Hullaby
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
