Cases 21 - 30 of 92
Lorenzo Bunch, Jr. v. Gene Johnson
as 10-6733
Petitioner - Appellant:
LORENZO BUNCH, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Antonio Robinson v. Gene Johnson
as 10-6680
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTONIO DESHAWN ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
David Cudworth v. Gene Johnson
as 10-6459
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID JAMES CUDWORTH
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections and CHIEF PROBATION OFFICER OF DISTRICT 15
Stanley Moore v. Gene Johnson
as 10-6467
Petitioner - Appellant:
STANLEY C. MOORE
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Leroy Evans v. Gene Johnson
as 10-6301
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEROY ANTONIO EVANS
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Brandon Lewis v. Gene Johnson
as 10-6167
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRANDON L. LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Kenneth Sweeting v. Gene Johnson
as 10-6119
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH DARNIEL SWEETING
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Ebony Baskerville v. Gene Johnson
as 10-6097
Petitioner - Appellant:
EBONY DASCHION BASKERVILLE
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Kenneth Barbour v. Gene Johnson
as 10-6076
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Lionel Blackmon v. Gene Johnson
as 10-6001
Petitioner - Appellant:
LIONEL BLACKMON
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.