Cases 1 - 10 of 20
SWIM v. GEO CORPORATION et al
as 3:2023cv24751
Plaintiff:
ROD SWIM
Defendant:
GEO CORPORATION, BLACK FEMALE, SGT OF E DROM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EZELL v. BROWN et al
as 3:2023cv16487
Plaintiff:
ROB ERIC EZELL
Defendant:
BROWN, THE GEO GROUP, TWO UNKNOWN GEO PRISON GUARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00150
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TAYLOR v. REEVES et al
as 5:2021cv00419
Plaintiff:
DERRICK P TAYLOR
Defendant:
WARDEN ANGELA REEVES and GEO CORPORATION GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. GEO CORPORATION et al
as 3:2021cv00856
Defendant:
DAVIS, GEO CORPORATION, EASTRIDE and others
Plaintiff:
KAVIN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skipper v. Maye et al
as 9:2020cv81452
Defendant:
South Bay Correctional, Florida Departent of Corrections, Brian R. Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Skipper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skipper v. Maye et al
as 2:2020cv00647
Defendant:
South Bay Correctional, Florida Departent of Corrections, Brian R. Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Skipper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. GEO Corporation et al
as 9:2019cv80887
Defendant:
Ms. Amide, Warden Claude Maye, Dr. Jules Heller and others
Plaintiff:
Felix Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demosthenes v. GEO Corporation et al
as 9:2018cv80963
Defendant:
Claude Maye, John Doe and GEO Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Demosthenes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. GEO CORPORATION et al
as 5:2018cv00083
Plaintiff:
RAY EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GEO CORPORATION, RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and J VERNON NEEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
