Cases 21 - 30 of 142
Curtis v. Trump et al
as 8:2017cv02345
Plaintiff:
Alan Boyd Curtis
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, United States, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corbin v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00901
Plaintiff:
James Corbin
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and Geo Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2017cv00331
Defendant:
State of Florida, Florida Departent of Corrections, GEO GROUP and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrd v. Hernandez et al
as 2:2017cv00269
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Byrd
Defendant:
R. Hernandez, Jr. and The Geo Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abaunza v. Geo Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Abaunza
Defendant:
Geo Group, Inc., Correct Care Recovery Solutions, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Geo Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00036
Plaintiff:
Gregory O'Neil Henderson
Defendant:
Geo Group, Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abaunza v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00812
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Abaunza
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Correct Care Recovery Solutions, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pineda v. GEO Group/Correct Care Recovery Solutions et al
as 2:2016cv00751
Plaintiff:
Nelson Pineda
Defendant:
GEO Group/Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Kristen Kanner, Mike Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bilal v. GEO Group, Inc. (GEO)
as 2:2016cv00329
Petitioner:
Jamaal Ali Bilal
Respondent:
GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) and Kristin Kanner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gering v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00267
Plaintiff:
Robert Gering
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
