Cases 61 - 70 of 119
Crook, Jr. v. Neal et al
as 3:2020cv00757
Defendant:
Gordon, Ron Neal and George Payne
Plaintiff:
Michael D Crook, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Payne et al
as 3:2020cv00734
Defendant:
George Payne, Jr, William Hytaa and Bennett
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Gibson
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Reid v. George Payne, et al
as 20-2267
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN REID
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE PAYNE, Deputy Warden, in his official and individual capacities, MR. MORRIS, Aramark employee, in his individual and official capacities and RON NEAL, Warden, in his official capacity
Strominger v. Neal et al
as 3:2020cv00266
Defendant:
Eduardo Tobon, Douglas Wardlow, Anthony Neal and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Strominger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gates v. Neal et al
as 3:2020cv00102
Defendant:
Buckman, Cavanaugh, Nurse Jackie and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Gates, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Payne et al
as 3:2019cv01164
Plaintiff:
Brian Reid
Defendant:
George Payne, Jr and Marcus Thompson
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doolin v. Neal et al
as 3:2019cv01010
Defendant:
George Payne, Kildow and Ron Neal
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Doolin
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Carter et al
as 3:2018cv00835
Defendant:
Major Nowatzke, Wardlow, Ron Neal and others
Plaintiff:
Yatmon Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. Carter
as 3:2018cv00588
Plaintiff:
Cody W Phelps
Defendant:
Rob Carter, L A VanNatta, Ron Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henson v. Carter et al
as 3:2018cv00474
Plaintiff:
Timothy G Henson
Defendant:
Ron Carter, Ron Neal and George Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
