Cases 41 - 50 of 211
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Yawn v. Mine Safety Appliances Company, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00085
Plaintiff:
Kendall Eugene Yawn
Defendant:
Mine Safety Appliances Company, LLC , Brunswick Cellulose, LLC and Georgia-Pacific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wyatt v. Georgia-Pacific LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00285
Plaintiff:
Justin Wyatt
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC , Georgia-Pacific Brewton LLC and Georgia-Pacific Bleached Board LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC et al v. SMITH INDUSTRIAL SERVICE INC et al
as 4:2017cv00255
Plaintiff:
GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC and KERRY GRANT LANDRUM
Defendant:
SMITH INDUSTRIAL SERVICE INC and HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sacon v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv21429
Plaintiff:
Lionel Sacon
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, CBS Corporation, Crane Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Landrum v. Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP et al
as 2:2016cv00479
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Landrum
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP and Sherry Knight
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Landrum v. Georgia-Pacific LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00399
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Landrum
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC and Sherry Knight
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Landrum v. Georgia-Pacific LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00399
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Landrum
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP and Sherry Knight
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Shields v. Georgia-Pacific LLC
as 2:2016cv00263
Plaintiff:
Billy Shields
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
