Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Caldwell v. Pierce et al
as 1:2016cv00674
Plaintiff:
Fred T. Caldwell
Defendant:
David Pierce, Matthew Dutton, Robert D. Wallis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2015cv01035
Plaintiff:
Andre R. Thomas
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Dr. Spraga, Dr. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acosta et al v. Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, et al.
as 1:2015cv01024
Plaintiff:
Ronald Layne Smith, Ryan C. Rasmussen, Reginald J. Belton and others
Defendant:
Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, KBR, Inc., Halliburton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Damiani v. Gill et al
as 1:2015cv00694
Plaintiff:
Pablo A. Damiani
Defendant:
George Gill, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Moksha8 Inc.
as 1:2014cv01394
Plaintiff:
Balkrishan Gill
Defendant:
Moksha8 Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Thirty-Nine Employees of the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center et al
as 1:2013cv01848
Plaintiff:
Albert J. Smith
Defendant:
Thirty-Nine Employees of the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, Rispoli, Enders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bass v. Danberg et al
as 1:2013cv00249
Plaintiff:
Donald F. Bass
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, Drace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacFadyen v. Uniquely Greek LLC et al
as 1:2012cv01127
Plaintiff:
Ian W. J. MacFadyen
Defendant:
Uniquely Greek LLC, Jessica Gill and Jon Gill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Zazzali v. Alexander Partners LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00828
Plaintiff:
James R. Zazzali
Defendant:
Alexander Partners LLC, Alternative Wholesaling Group LLC, Arque Orion Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Hutt v. Phelps et al
as 1:2012cv00144
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Hutt
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, George Gill, Vincent May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
