Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Gilmore v. Deputy Chief Hass et al
as 2:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Corves K. Gilmore
Defendant:
The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Respondent:
Deputy Chief Hass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilmore v. Deputy Chief Haas
as 2:2023cv01949
Petitioner:
Corves K. Gilmore
Respondent:
Deputy Chief Haas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00570
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01761
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gilmore v. Reno Justice Court et al
as 3:2020cv00089
Petitioner:
Roy Gilmore
Respondent:
Aaron D. Ford and Reno Justice Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gilmore v. Bachmen et al
as 2:2014cv00162
Defendant:
Shana Bachmen, Rily Baker and Binu Palal
Plaintiff:
Lamar Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Wyeth LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00618
Defendant:
Barr Laboratories, Inc., Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Pfizer Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sheila Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Caston et al v. ONeal et al
as 2:2008cv00059
Plaintiff:
Charles Caston and Shaunie Oneal
Defendant:
Shaquel ONeal, Miami Heat, Walgreens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
N.O.W. v. Oneal et al
as 2:2008cv00038
Plaintiff:
N.O.W.
Defendant:
Shaunie Oneal, George Washington University, Calico Creek Apartments and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
