Cases 1 - 7 of 7
County Of Westchester v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv07893
Plaintiff:
County Of Westchester
Defendant:
Actavis Holdco US, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Conley v. Anjanta Pharma USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00463
Defendant:
Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novitium Pharma, LLC, PAI Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Conley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
County of Suffolk v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04009
Defendant:
Bausch Health Americas, Inc., Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pliva, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Suffolk and Wockhardt USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Connecticut et al v. Sandoz, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00802
Defendant:
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC, Pfizer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
State of New Mexico, State of Missouri, State of Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
County of Nassau et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et. al.
as 2:2019cv07071
Defendant:
Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pliva, Inc., Sandoz, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Clinton, County of Allegany, County of Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC et al v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC et al
as 3:2019cv01972
Defendant:
PAR Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., Sandoz, Inc., Upshers-Smith Laboratories, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLP, SERIES, PMPI, a designated series of MAO-MSO Recovery, MSPA Claims 1, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Connecticut et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00710
Plaintiff:
State of North Dakota, State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant:
Actavis Pharma, Inc., Richard Rogerson, Nisha Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
