Cases
JANE DOE 3 v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL SCHOOL DISTRICT IN THE COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER et al
as 1:2019cv14487
Plaintiff: JANE DOE and JANE DOE 3
Defendant: ADAM MAYR, BOARD OF EDUCATION OF VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL SCHOOL DISTRICT IN THE COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER; GLOUCESTER COUNTY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ; GLOUCESTER COUNTY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL SCHOOL DISTRICT IN THE COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
DOE 3 v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv13793
Plaintiff: JANE DOE 3
Defendant: GLOUCESTER COUNTY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, ADAM MAYR and THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL SCHOOL DISTRICT IN THE COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
S.K. et al v. THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL SCHOOL DISTRICT IN THE COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER et al
as 1:2017cv03323
Plaintiff: S.K. , A.L. , L.P. and others
Defendant: THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL SCHOOL DISTRICT IN THE COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER , GLOUCESTER COUNTY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY , ADAM MAYR and others
Cross_claimant: ADAM MAYR
Cross_defendant: ABC BUSINESS ENTITIES 1-10, GLOUCESTER COUNTY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DOE 1 et al v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY et al
as 1:2017cv03327
Plaintiff: JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2
Defendant: GLOUCESTER COUNTY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY , THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE SPECIAL SERVICES SCHOOL DISTRICT AND THE VOCATIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER , ADAM MAYR and others
Cross_claimant: ADAM MAYR
Cross_defendant: GLOUCESTER COUNTY, GLOUCESTER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, GLOUCESTER COUNTY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?