Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
GAITHER v. RARE HOSPITALITY INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02371
Plaintiff:
WALTER GAITHER
Defendant:
RARE HOSPITALITY INTERNATIONAL, INC., GMRI, INC., DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
FYKE v. GMRI, INC
as 1:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE FYKE
Defendant:
GMRI, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CLEAN TEXTILE SYSTEMS, L.P. v. GMRI, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00515
Plaintiff:
CLEAN TEXTILE SYSTEMS, L.P. doing business as CLEAN CARE
Defendant:
GMRI, INC. and DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00384
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCGARRY v. GMRI, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00606
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. MCGARRY
Defendant:
GMRI, INC. , DARDEN RESTRAINTS, INC. and BAHAMA BREEZE HOLDINGS, INC.
Counter_claimant:
GMRI, INC. , DARDEN RESTRAINTS, INC. and BAHAMA BREEZE HOLDINGS, INC.
Counter_defendant:
DAVID B. MCGARRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
