Cases 11 - 20 of 112
Daniel Saavedra v. Ron Godwin
as 2:2022cv06685
Petitioner:
Daniel Saavedra
Respondent:
Acting Warden Ron Godwin and Ron Godwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nieto v. Godwin et al
as 3:2022cv01161
Petitioner:
Jose Nieto
Respondent:
Ron Godwin and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Angel Hernandez v. Ron Godwin
as 22-16136
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANGEL HERNAN HERNANDEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
RON GODWIN, Warden
Sherman Bell v. Godwin Ugwueze, et al
as 22-16119
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHERMAN M. BELL
Defendant / Appellee:
GODWIN UGWUEZE, CHINYERE NYENKE, CLARENCE CRYER and others
(HC) Lopez v. Godwin
as 1:2022cv00735
Petitioner:
Jorge Mejia Lopez
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus and Rod Godwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruben Nevarez v. Rod Godwin, et al
as 22-55578
Petitioner / Appellant:
RUBEN NEVAREZ
Respondent / Appellee:
ROD GODWIN, Warden
Respondent:
MATTHEW RODRIGUEZ
(PC) Wilson v. Meritt, et al.
as 1:2022cv00455
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Wilson
Defendant:
Lura Meritt, California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison at Corcoran, Public Entity of CDCR in Corcoran Calif and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Meritt et al
as 4:2022cv02396
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Wilson
Defendant:
Lura Meritt, California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison at Corcoran, Public Entity of CDCR in Corcoran Calif and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlos Jay Martinez v. Ron Godwin
as 2:2022cv02408
Petitioner:
Carlos Martinez
Respondent:
Ron Godwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carlos Jay Martinez v. Ron Godwin
as 5:2022cv00620
Petitioner:
Carlos Martinez
Respondent:
Ron Godwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
