Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Rios v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Gregory Rushin, Dan Corvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godwin v. McLarty et al
as 1:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Roger Godwin
Defendant:
FNU McLarty, BOP Director and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Godwin v. BOP Director et al
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Roger Godwin
Defendant:
BOP Director, Dr. Luis Ramos, FNU Franks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ubah v. Denton County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
Godwin Ike Ubah
Defendant:
Denton County Jail, Tracy Murphree and Denton County Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutter v. Garland et al
as 5:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Shawn Louis Sutter
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Michael Carvajal, Warden S. Salmonson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Santillan v. United States of America et al
as 4:2021cv02410
Plaintiff:
Seung Min Santillan
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Prison Camp-Bryan, L. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troxell et al v. Harris County Sheriff's Department
as 4:2020cv01625
Plaintiff:
Daryl Hatter, Michael Morales, Juan Jose Solorio and others
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Umotong v. USA
as 3:2016cv02476
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Godwin Umotong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Grohoske v. Berger et al
as 1:2016cv00929
Defendant:
Larry Berger, Bryan Collier, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
David Lester Grohoske
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grohoske v. Godwin et al
as 1:2016cv00886
Defendant:
Larry Berger, Bryan Collier, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
David Lester Grohoske
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
