Cases 1 - 10 of 25
GOK v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv04838
Plaintiff:
HAYRIYE BERIL GOK
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOMEZ v. MATOS TOWING et al
as 5:2022cv04371
Plaintiff:
LAWANDA GOMEZ
Defendant:
MATOS TOWING, MATTHEW GRIFFITH and WILLIAM FURSIN, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOMEZ v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
as 2:2022cv02949
Plaintiff:
Saddie Debissette Gomez
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Rieheimer et al
as 1:2021cv01534
Plaintiff:
Shakira Brown
Defendant:
Ryan Rieheimer, Julian Gomez, Alex Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VANLOAN v. THE NATION OF ISLAM et al
as 2:2021cv02559
Defendant:
POLICE CHIEF DAVID NISLEIT, MAIN LINE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., RICHARD ORLOW and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN VANLOAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04489
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Gomez v. Sanzi et al
as 1:2020cv01113
Defendant:
John Doe 2, Nathan V. Oliver, Gary B. Sanzi and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrio Martin Wazar Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00942
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
GOMEZ v. CZAPOR et al
as 2:2018cv05402
Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10 and OFFICER JONATHAN CZAPOR
Plaintiff:
FRANSICO GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOMEZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv02097
Plaintiff:
PIERRE GOMEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER, CLAUDE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
